My Links

Bloggernacle Links

  • Mormon Archipelago
  • Mormon Blogs
  • LDSelect
  • LDS Blogs

Article Categories

Post Categories

Archives

Other LDS Blogs

Our Individual Blogs

Ordinance Entrance Tests

By: Tess Prior

A few months ago, my youngest brother went to be interviewed by our home ward Bishop in preparation to be ordained to the office of Elder. My youngest brother is a good kid—quiet, easy-going, obedient. He’s never given my parents a moment’s worry (no drugs, no liquor, no parties, no girlfriends.) In fact, we tease my brother that he is our family’s Nephi—the younger sibling who has to keep the older ones in line. And in our mixed faith, non-Priesthood holding family, I think that’s quite the compliment.  On a personal level, I was excited to think that I could soon go to my newly ordained brother for Priesthood blessings.

But my brother came home from the interview in silence. We asked what was wrong. “He told me that I’m not ready. That I don’t know enough to be ordained to the office of an Elder.” The bishop had sent my brother away without suggesting another interview or giving him reading homework. He had just sent him away. My brother-in-law (a pioneer stock Mormon who is serving in his home ward’s bishopric) asked my brother questions about the duties of being an Elder. “He knows more than I did about the office of Elder when I was ordained,” he told me in a later conversation.

The situation left me torn. I often feel we don’t ensure that people know enough before they are allowed to take part in various ordinances. After all, we do baptize people who have a very limited understanding of the gospel. And I know that we baptize people who have a very limited understanding of the gospel because I was one of them as a 13-year-old convert. (I remember sitting in my baptismal interview with a missionary who asked me if I knew what the Word of Wisdom was. “Um, is that the law means that we promise not to have sex before marriage?” I responded, blushing.) I am fully in support of making sure members know the weightiness and the responsibilities that come with the ordinances they receive. And yet, my heart ached for my brother whose desire for the ordinance was there and whose confidence had been shattered as a result of the interview. He felt like he had failed the spiritual equivalent of the SAT.

There is a delicate balance between knowledge and desire as ordinance qualifiers just as there is a delicate balance between justice and mercy as judgment tools. We need both. I don’t doubt or dispute that we need both. However, I wonder what could be done to better ensure that converts are prepared for the unfamiliar territory of temple recommend interviews, PEC meetings, Patriarchal blessings, etc. Perhaps it’s time the church published a general handbook for members. After all, bishops and missionaries get handbooks to help them navigate that which is unfamiliar. Why not do the same for the general church population?  Because, at the end of the day, no one should ever feel like they’ve flunked a spiritual entrance test.

Print | posted on Sunday, October 28, 2007 11:23 PM | Filed Under [ Tess Prior ]

Comments:

#1: Eric Nielson

From what you have said, I think that what the bishop did in this case is inexcuseable. If your brother did not have worthiness issues, and new even the basics of the gospel, he should have been recommended for ordination. And to have not been given specific things to read, and ways to prepare.....I can't believe it.

I hope there was some kind of follow up. Good grief.
10/29/2007 6:48 AM

#2: Darrell

I would find this hard to believe but a similar thing happened to my son, except it was with his Patriarchal blessing. Matt seemed to be doing fine in the gospel, had recently been ordained an Elder and wanted his blessing. So he went to the Bishop and got his recommend for the blessing and went to the Patriarch. The patriarch placed his hand on his head, paused and said, "I'm sorry but I do not have a blessing for you." He then excused himself and left. My son was devastated and wondered what he had done to receive such a rebuke from the Lord. I'm not sure either. Since then, my son has become inactive and has some intense personal problems. I am not blaming the Lord or the Patriarch for Matt's issues with the church but this experience did not help. Tess, do everything you can to support your brother in this trial. He can be stronger. Help him not to let it beat him down.
10/29/2007 1:55 PM

#3: Tess Prior

I should add an epilogue to this. My brother left for school (BYU) shortly after this happened. He asked his new bishop if he could become an Elder, the new bishop interviewed him and started to get things rolling. He called the home ward Bishop who again asserted that my brother wasn't ready. My brother went in for a second interview and explained what had happened in the previous interview. They are just now preparing for the ordination.

Fortunately, this didn't affect my brother's testimony. The incident hasn't affected my testimony. I know that the home ward Bishop is trying to fulfill his calling as best as he knows how. I don't think he's gone about it in the right way at all. But he's not a bad man and I know that.

Darrell, your comment about your son's Patriarchal blessing is similarly shocking. This is why I would really love for there to be some kind of member's handbook. So that those who aren't in positions of authority know what the church protocol is for interviews-- what can be expected, what is reasonable and what is not. When I was investigating the church, I didn't know any of the missionary rules. One of the sister missionaries who taught me was dating (and later became engaged to) one of the Elders in her district while they were serving. For years, I was unaware that it was against the rules for missionaries to explore romantic relationships with other missionaries. So, again, I'd love to have a general handbook for members. And I'd love to know what you all think about this. Would it cause more problems than it solves?
10/29/2007 2:42 PM

#4: Darrell

Least anyone have any misconceptions, I am sure that the fact that the Patriarch did not have a blessing for my son was due to the problems my son is having with the Church (perhaps the Patriarch saw that Matt was not ready for a blessing and the Bishop missed it) rather than the other way round--i.e. my son's problems with the Church caused by the Patriarch.
10/29/2007 3:08 PM

#5: Eric Nielson

Tess:

I don't really think that the guidlines bishops currently follow are a big secret or anything.

I wonder, if we all had a complete job description of what a bishop should be doing there would be two primary effects (at least). One effect would be that we would realize how few things that only a bishop can do. They often endo up doing much more than is their responsibility. Another effect is that some members would use it as ammo against local bishops. Some in the membership would then exorcise a strange type of unrighteous dominion over their own bishops.

I think in most cases it would be better to review the matter with the stake leadership.
10/29/2007 3:10 PM

#6: Ray

Amen to what Eric just said - especially the last paragraph.

I only will add that sometimes Bishops are inspired in ways that surprise even them - and that don't make any sense whatsoever to anyone, including them. I am not "defending" the bishop's decision with regard to Tess' brother, since there is no way I know enough about the situation to make even an informed comment, but I have learned to be less critical of their decisions given my past callings and current calling than I might have been otherwise. There are bishops who make uninspired decisions, and all bishops make mistakes, but some decisions that seem wrong at the time (like Darrell's Patriach's non-blessing) are truly inspired when seen in hindsight. It's easy to blame future decisions of members on past decisions of leaders, but it isn't always as clear as it appears - especially to those who have a vested interest in the decisions.
10/29/2007 6:37 PM

#7: Tess Prior

I'd like to emphasize that the member's handbook I'm proposing would not include Bishop's duties or responsibilities. This post is not or was it meant to be a Bishop-bashing fest. I'm not interested in criticizing the leaders. I am interested in helping converts know what to expect in unfamiliar situations. For example, the member's handbook could include a section on simple things like being set apart for callings-- why we do it, who does it and when we do it. This sort of thing...
10/29/2007 7:46 PM

#8: Darrell

Tess, we bought this book for a friend who was recently baptized. It is something like you are talking about. Our friend relies on this a great deal.

http://deseretbook.com/store/product?sku=3706769
10/29/2007 11:58 PM

Post Comment:

Name  
Email
Url
Comment   
Please add 1 and 3 and type the answer here:

Powered by: